Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!ron
From: ron@brl-tgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Re: re: Camera Vibration and Sharpness (photo labs)
Message-ID: <9338@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 19-Mar-85 15:00:41 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.9338
Posted: Tue Mar 19 15:00:41 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 23-Mar-85 00:48:25 EST
References: <330@lcuxc.UUCP> <381@wjvax.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 20



> For normal stuff, you can't go wrong with Kodak.

Ditto, ditto.  For years I did all my Black and White myself, good B&W
is fairly easy, it does take a little time.  All my color work goes to
Kodak, which has never messed up anything permanently, and you can always
reject prints that to your taste, weren't done right.  I've never had any
body even question me when I sent stuff back.  What's really neat is that
I live close enough to the tranparency developing facility that I get one
day service on slides.

I did once take a picture of a yellowed painting under available light
with Daylight film.  The colors on the slide are understandably lousy.
When I had an 8x10 made up, Kodaks color banancing wizmo color adjusted
the whole thing so that it looks almost natural (better than real life).
Of course they've messed things up also, causing a picture with some red
in it to turn almos purple.

-Ron