Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!wkp
From: wkp@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: On Don Black and Christian Government
Message-ID: <23317@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 15-Mar-85 12:20:04 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.23317
Posted: Fri Mar 15 12:20:04 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 17-Mar-85 01:18:17 EST
References: <1651V6M@PSUVM>
Sender: newsreader@lanl.ARPA
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 30

> Don is correct...I have no qualms with Black...
> Black's point...is well taken,
> 
> 
> I don't have all of Black's postings saved but while I disagree with his
> theology...I must defend                                                  
> the reasonableness of his position which is CONSISTENT with the fundamentalist
> world view.  And what really upsets me is that most of the critics positions
> were too much knee-jerk-liberal!!!
> 
> Most, but not all, of his points were main stream Christian:

Well, I guess Rich was right.  EVEN NON-FUNDAMENTALISTS ARE IN AGREEMENT
WITH BLACK!  While Black is spouting his hatred of Jews, liberals, and
non-missionary-positioners on this net, Machionni has the visciousness
to discuss theology with this guy!  And denigrating his critics!!!!
Even worse!  Saying things like "Don is correct," or "I have no
qualms with Black," or "Black's point is well taken."

Oh great Ubizmo!  Is this what people like Marchionni were doing while
the European Jews were being put in death camps?  (Don't answer this,
I know the answer already.)

> From his postings I think Don is willing to work within the compromise
> of a pluralistic society.

Stick it, Marchionni.
--

bill peter