Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2(pesnta.1.2) 9/5/84; site scc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!lsuc!pesnta!scc!steiny
From: steiny@scc.UUCP (Don Steiny)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Return With Us Now To Those Thrilling Days Of Yester-Year!
Message-ID: <462@scc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 18-Mar-85 12:02:30 EST
Article-I.D.: scc.462
Posted: Mon Mar 18 12:02:30 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 18-Mar-85 20:23:17 EST
References: <185@ihu1n.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Independent Consultant
Lines: 24

>
>      Why have you lumped UNISEX & HOMOSEXUALITY TOGETHER? Since when
>    have "Androgeny" & "Homosexuality" been interchangeable? Last I heard
>    they are totally seperate issues/concepts/practices. 
>

	A few weeks ago I overheard a conversation in the 7-11 between
two young women.  One saw a picture of Prince or Michael Jackson
(or somebody like that) and said to the other "I wonder if he
is androgenous?"  (I got real interested, wondering why she
didn't just look at his picture on the cover of the magazine
to find out).   The other said "What does androgenous mean?" (I
lucked out!).  The first said, "you know, they are both sexes."
After looking through the magazine for a moment she said "ah yes,
here it is, he's androgenous!"   It seems that she confused
the word "androgenous" with "hermaphroditic".     Perhaps
the confusion is more common than I realized.


-- 
scc!steiny
Don Steiny - Personetics @ (408) 425-0382    ihnp4!pesnta   -\
109 Torrey Pine Terr.                        ucbvax!twg     --> scc!steiny
Santa Cruz, Calif. 95060                     fortune!idsvax -/