Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site azure.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!teklds!azure!annab
From: annab@azure.UUCP (A Beaver)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Dividing Line
Message-ID: <142@azure.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 10-Mar-85 13:14:16 EST
Article-I.D.: azure.142
Posted: Sun Mar 10 13:14:16 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 13-Mar-85 00:18:50 EST
Organization: The Den
Lines: 23

>References: <542@hou5g.UUCP>

> More on woman/girl.
> Assuming (from previous article) the following:
> Age:	0-18	16-35?	30+
> title:	boy	guy	man
> title:	girl	?	woman
> 
> Julia Harper

	So, what is wrong with 'Young Lady'? I know that 'I' don't have any
	problem with the term. I generally think of most folk under 50 as
	being young, as they can be quite active and enjoy life just as much
	as, or more than, when they were 30. After that it is pretty much a 
	matter of attitude. Want to make a 40 yr old woman smile? Call her
	a young lady and watch.
	(I call ANY man who is younger than me a 'Young Man'. Unless they ACT
	 childish and then I call them a 'Kid'.)

	  Annadiana Beaver
	 A Beaver@Tektronix	   "Words, for instence, exist as energy.
				The essence of their meanings is often lost."
						-Onoffon-