Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!mcnc!unc!fsks
From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Keywd: GIRLS
Message-ID: <181@unc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 11-Mar-85 15:56:18 EST
Article-I.D.: unc.181
Posted: Mon Mar 11 15:56:18 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 13-Mar-85 04:08:07 EST
References: <decwrl.731> <152@unc.UUCP> <ptsfc.337>
Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lines: 25
Summary: 

In article <ptsfc.337> rjw@ptsfc.UUCP (Rod Williams) writes:
>>	The word "girl" has at least two meanings.  It can refer to any
>>	prepubescent female.  Also, it is often used to describe any
>>	adult female who is still young enough to be sexually attractive.
>	                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Uh...you mean girls like Jane Fonda, Shirley MacLaine, Catherine
> Deneuve, Gloria Steinem, Lena Horne, Tina Turner, Helen Hayes,
> Ruth Gordon, Barbara Walters, Jackie Onassis, Jackie Bisset,
> Julie Christie...???

First of all, nobody's seen Jackie Onassis lately, without her sunglasses.

As for Gloria Steinem, I might call her a girl, if only to annoy her.

Most of the rest are movie actresses.  Haven't you heard of special effects?
Didn't you see "Star Wars"?  It's all make-up, like with Dustin Hoffman
in "Tootsie".  Even if Jane Fonda does still look good, she's nowhere near
the pinnacle of cuteness she displayed in "Barbarella".

You're turned on by Helen Hayes and Ruth Gordon???????  Chacun a son gout.

:-)
		Frank Silbermann
		University of North Carolina