Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihuxb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ihuxb!mcal
From: mcal@ihuxb.UUCP (Mike Clifford)
Newsgroups: net.taxes,net.abortion,net.kids
Subject: Re: An Immodest Proposal
Message-ID: <978@ihuxb.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Apr-85 08:07:36 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxb.978
Posted: Tue Apr  9 08:07:36 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 10-Apr-85 06:25:39 EST
References: <3521@alice.UUCP> <5112@cbscc.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 10
Xref: watmath net.taxes:798 net.abortion:1427 net.kids:1151

> Hmm.  What if we adopted a "flat tax" proposal that did away
> with deductions for dependants.  Would that mean the dependants
> (born or not) are not human?
> -- 
> 
> Paul Dubuc 	cbscc!pmd


No, of course not.  It would simply mean that couples would not get 
a tax break for having children.