Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cmu-cs-k.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!cmu-cs-pt!cmu-cs-k!tim
From: tim@cmu-cs-k.ARPA (Tim Maroney)
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Re: detect invisibility
Message-ID: <345@cmu-cs-k.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 26-Mar-85 16:41:26 EST
Article-I.D.: cmu-cs-k.345
Posted: Tue Mar 26 16:41:26 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Mar-85 06:00:32 EST
References: <544@whuxl.UUCP>
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, Networking
Lines: 8

While we're on the subject of Detect Invisibility, does any one object to my
interpretation, which is that only ONE form of hiding is negated?  That is,
if someone is invisible AND ethereal, Detect Invisibility won't show him,
although True Seeing would.
-=-
Tim Maroney, Carnegie-Mellon University, Networking
ARPA:	Tim.Maroney@CMU-CS-K	uucp:	seismo!cmu-cs-k!tim
CompuServe:	74176,1360	audio:	shout "Hey, Tim!"