Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site aecom.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!cmcl2!rna!cubsvax!cucard!aecom!eliovson
From: eliovson@aecom.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.games.frp
Subject: Re: invisibility
Message-ID: <1322@aecom.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Mar-85 13:11:40 EST
Article-I.D.: aecom.1322
Posted: Wed Mar 27 13:11:40 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 2-Apr-85 07:35:55 EST
References: <544@whuxl.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY
Lines: 30

> Malefectorius

	who me?


> If the monster's ability is `detect invisibilty' as in the AD&D spell,
> then you were quite visible.
> to quote:
> `...he or she is able to clearly see any objects which are invisible, as
> well as astral, ethereal, hidden, invisible(sic) or out of phase creatures.'
> 

	Is hiding really the same as being invisible?  I guess this would
depend on whether or not I was behind something or just in the shadows with
my cloak...


> If your dm was running the monster's ability like the dragon ability,
> then you lose again `detect hidden or invisible'.  I would tend to give
> this ability to dragons, but I wouldn't be as generous with other monsters.


	With detect hidden, yes, since we all know that most dragons
have a particular distaste for *HUMANS!* (courtesy of Joel Rosenberg's
Guardians of the Flame series), but this was just a wimpy Xegya.


		Moshe Eliovson
		Scourge of the Dungeon (Masters)
		philabs!aecom!eliovson