Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site boring.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!mcvax!boring!lambert
From: lambert@boring.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.math
Subject: Re: A.C versus A.D.
Message-ID: <6368@boring.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Mar-85 02:06:03 EST
Article-I.D.: boring.6368
Posted: Wed Mar 27 02:06:03 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Mar-85 00:36:38 EST
References: <362@talcott.UUCP>
Reply-To: lambert@boring.UUCP (Lambert Meertens)
Distribution: net
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 16
Summary: Sorry
Apparently-To: rnews@mcvax.LOCAL

> Lambert Meertens has stated that he sees no justification for the Axiom of
> Choice.  Well, that's odd, because I see no justification for not having
> it, and I particularly see no reason to have the Axiom of Determinism.  Are
> you an A.D. fan, Mr. Meertens?  Are there other A.D. fans out there?  Are
> there A.D.ists and/or anti-A.C.ists out there who are not constructivists?

Sorry, if I am an A.D. fan, I am unaware of it, since I must confess I
don't know what A.D. claims.

(If Greg preaches the gospel to A.D. fans, he might achieve
A.D. conversion :-)  -- Sorry again, couldn't resist that.
-- 

     Lambert Meertens
     ...!{seismo,philabs,decvax}!lambert@mcvax.UUCP
     CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Amsterdam