Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site alice.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!alice!ark
From: ark@alice.UUCP (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation (Part 1)
Message-ID: <3534@alice.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 6-Apr-85 12:07:39 EST
Article-I.D.: alice.3534
Posted: Sat Apr  6 12:07:39 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 7-Apr-85 04:12:25 EST
References: <328@iham1.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 15

When I read the title of this article, I became excited:
perhaps someone was finally going to give me some evidence
for creation, so I might be able to judge the merits of
the theory for myself!

Unfortunately, all I saw was arguments against evolution.

As usual, these are of the form: "It didn't happen here,
it didn't happen there, so it didn't happen anywhere!"

ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST EVOLUTION ARE IRRELEVANT TO
ARGUMENTS FOR OR AGAINST CREATION!

I am still waiting for someone to post an argument
for creation.