Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!ward
From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Why Creation?
Message-ID: <1446@hao.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 8-Apr-85 09:24:09 EST
Article-I.D.: hao.1446
Posted: Mon Apr  8 09:24:09 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 9-Apr-85 03:56:26 EST
References: <14600006@hpfcrs.UUCP>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 15

[]
Lief presents a very elegant and persuasive argument in favor
of the Genesis account of Creation, and for the existance of
God.

He, however, seems to miss the point that the discussion here
has been about the scientific nature of creationism.  In all
his large article he presents not one shred of scientific evidence
about anything.  It is typical of the whole article that he says
that he is a creationist because he beleives in a personal God.

I wonder, is he trying to change the direction of the discussion?
It would probably be a wise move for the creationists, since
they have been failing utterly to establish any scientific basis
for their obviously religious beliefs.