Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site iham1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!iham1!rck From: rck@iham1.UUCP (Ron Kukuk) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: The Scientific Case for Creation (Part 3) Message-ID: <330@iham1.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Apr-85 13:24:18 EST Article-I.D.: iham1.330 Posted: Tue Apr 9 13:24:18 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 10-Apr-85 05:46:58 EST Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 89 THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR CREATION: 116 CATEGORIES OF EVIDENCE I. (Life Sciences): THE THEORY OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION IS INVALID. A. EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED. ... 6. No known mutation has ever produced a form of life having both greater complexity and greater viability [a,b] than any of its ancestors [c-f]. a) ''Do we, therefore, ever see mutations going about the business of producing new structures for selection to work on? No nascent organ has ever been observed emerging, though their origin in pre-functional form is basic to evolutionary theory. Some should be visible today, occurring in organisms at various stages up to integration of a functional new system, but we don't see them: there is no sign at all of this kind of radical novelty. Neither observation nor controlled experiment has shown natural selection manipulating mutations so as to produce a new gene, hormone, enzyme system or organ.'' [Michael Pitman, ADAM AND EVOLUTION (London: Rider, 1984), pp. 67-68.] b) ''There is no single instance where it can be maintained that any of the mutants studied has a higher vitality than the mother species.'' [N. Heribert Nilsson, (Lund University), SYNTHETISCHE ARTBILDUNG (Lund Sweden: Verlag CWK Gleerup, 1953), p. 1212.] c) Pierre-Paul Grasse, EVOLUTION OF LIVING ORGANISMS (New York: Academic Press, 1977), p. 88. d) ''It is good to keep in mind...that nobody has ever succeeded in producing even one new species by the accumulation of micromutations.'' [Richard Goldschmidt, THE MATERIAL BASIS OF EVOLUTION (Yale University Press). ] e) ''If one allows the unquestionable largest experimenter to speak, namely nature, one gets a clear and incontrovertible answer to the question about the significance of mutations for the formation of species and evolution. They disappear under the competitive conditions of natural selection, as soap bubbles burst in a breeze.'' [N. Heribert Nilsson, p. 174.] f) ''If life really depends on each gene being as unique as it appears to be, then it is too unique to come into being by chance mutations.'' [Frank B. Salisbury, (Plant Science Department, Utah State University), ''Natural Selection and the Complexity of the Gene,'' NATURE, Vol. 224, 25 October 1969, p. 342.] ... II. (Astronomical Sciences): TO BE CONTINUED III. (Earth Sciences): Ron Kukuk Walt Brown