Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site mhuxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!js2j
From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: The Scientific Case for Creation (Part 3)
Message-ID: <743@mhuxt.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Apr-85 15:38:44 EST
Article-I.D.: mhuxt.743
Posted: Tue Apr  9 15:38:44 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 10-Apr-85 05:54:23 EST
References: <330@iham1.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 15

>             THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR CREATION: 116 CATEGORIES OF EVIDENCE
> 
>        I.  (Life Sciences): THE THEORY OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION IS INVALID.
> 
>            A.  EVOLUTION HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED.

    Neat title, but when are we going to start seeing some of these 116 
categories of evidence for creation?  So far all you've posted are
old, discredited arguments against evolution, which is hardly the same
thing.
-- 
Jeff Sonntag
ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j
    "You're from Joisey?  I'm from Joisey!"
    "Which exit?"