Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site wucs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!wucs!esk
From: esk@wucs.UUCP (Paul V. Torek)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: corruption a non-word: accountability in Govt.
Message-ID: <862@wucs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 28-Mar-85 20:46:17 EST
Article-I.D.: wucs.862
Posted: Thu Mar 28 20:46:17 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 29-Mar-85 06:01:51 EST
References: <827@oliven.UUCP> <535@whuxl.UUCP> <5324@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: pvt1047@wucec1.UUCP (Paul V. Torek)
Organization: Washington U. in St. Louis, CS Dept.
Lines: 11
Summary: --except for all the others.

In article <5324@utzoo.UUCP> laura@utzoo.UUCP (Laura Creighton) writes:
>make up your mind. Either the democratic process works (in which
>case, why were you [Sevener]  so upset about Reagan) or it doesn't. If it

Not that simple.  It works, but badly.  BUT -- and I know I'm repeating
myself, but it doesn't seem to be sinking in -- all the others work even
more badly.  ("Absolutely the worst ... except for all the others".)  Now,
y'all think you can get the democrats' position through your thick heads?

					Iconoclastically,
					Paul V. Torek, wucs!wucec1!pvt1047