Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dciem.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!mmt From: mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: What is property? Message-ID: <1494@dciem.UUCP> Date: Sat, 30-Mar-85 16:38:00 EST Article-I.D.: dciem.1494 Posted: Sat Mar 30 16:38:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 30-Mar-85 18:09:35 EST References: <370@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP> <5252@utzoo.UUCP> <4985@ukc.UUCP> <836@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA> <1853@sdcrdcf.UUCP> Granted that all libertarian societies respect property rights, that >still leaves the question of "what is property" open. The practical >definition is "property is that to which the state grants property >rights." I find this unsatisfactory <- obvious sarcasm :->. I'm still >working on a definition of "property" that fits my sense of propriety. >It seems that if somebody using something doesn't deprive you (even >temporarily) of the use of the property, then your property rights >haven't been violated. As pointed out above, not allowing an inheritance >doesn't violate any property rights. Likewise, the concept of >"intellectual property" vanishes. > >Any comments from the hordes of the net? > >