Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site digi-g.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!digi-g!brian From: brian@digi-g.UUCP (Merlyn Leroy) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: What's a person? Message-ID: <534@digi-g.UUCP> Date: Mon, 1-Apr-85 16:28:06 EST Article-I.D.: digi-g.534 Posted: Mon Apr 1 16:28:06 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 6-Apr-85 02:21:59 EST References: <1597@bmcg.UUCP> <233@tilt.FUN> <676@unmvax.UUCP> <240@tilt.FUN> <1426@dciem.UUCP> <785@ucbtopaz.CC.Berkeley.ARPA> 1 Apr 85 21:28:06 GMT Reply-To: brian@digi-g.UUCP (brian) Distribution: net Organization: Digigraphic Systems Corp., Mpls, MN Lines: 44 Summary: mwm@ucbtopaz.UUCP (Mike the Hun) writes: >>>While they [founding fathers] didn't manage to turn out a truly libertarian >>>state, they did manage to keep the US from using force to make people >>>contribute to its idea of "good," at least temporarily. >>Like slavery? >Let's not pick nits. Let us speak of attempted genocide. > >The thing is, neither blacks nor indians were "people" (read: citizens) >early in the history of the US. As such, they didn't have any rights to >be violated. Taking into account the differences in "person" of the >time, I'll still stand by my claim. > > [various irrelevant stuff about sentience omitted] > >