Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdaisy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watdaisy!ndiamond
From: ndiamond@watdaisy.UUCP (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: net.puzzle
Subject: Re: Out of Virtual Memory?
Message-ID: <7186@watdaisy.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Apr-85 10:05:01 EST
Article-I.D.: watdaisy.7186
Posted: Tue Apr  9 10:05:01 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 10-Apr-85 03:03:35 EST
References: <1515@decwrl.UUCP> <581@ahuta.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 16

> In theory, no you can't run out of virtual memory.

Because theoretically, there's no limit on the size of a virtual address
that you can put in an instruction?  It's going to take you an awfully
long time to write that code, or for a compiler to generate the object
code.

-- 

   Norman Diamond

UUCP:  {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra}!watmath!watdaisy!ndiamond
CSNET: ndiamond%watdaisy@waterloo.csnet
ARPA:  ndiamond%watdaisy%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa

"Opinions are those of the keyboard, and do not reflect on me or higher-ups."