Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Dr. Emmanuel Wu) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Matthew 7:6 Message-ID: <819@pyuxd.UUCP> Date: Sun, 31-Mar-85 17:17:18 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxd.819 Posted: Sun Mar 31 17:17:18 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 1-Apr-85 04:19:38 EST References: <1399@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: STRONGARM COLLECTION AGENCY: We have no slogan Lines: 110 > Somehow I fail to understand why everything that is not > complimentary to Judaism is classified as "antisemetic," "Nazi," > "racist," "bigoted," "foolish," "unintelligent," "Neanderthal," > etc. Pick your explitive. People who don't follow the "approved" > version of history are "naive," "stupid," "unintelligent," > "a**h****s," "s***heads," etc. You fail to understand quite a lot of things. But that's to be expected, I guess. There's a good reason your lame rewrite of history in your own image isn't "approved": it's a load of made-up excrement designed by hateful people like you to spread your own brand of lies. No more. No less. And, again, you complain about things non-complimentary to Christians that are based on fact (though probably not in your new version of history), while feeling free to engage in spreading falsehoods of an uncomplimentary sort about other groups. It's not the same. No matter how much you whine and tell us that it is. > So far, the invectives I have seen on this net from some (not all) > of the contributors have only served to strengthen my beliefs. Let me > show you some examples of the MAIL I've received in the last few days. > Most of it speaks for itself. But I thought it was running 2-to-1 in your favor! What happened? Did the tide change? Or did you just forget one of the lies you made up? > Notice some of the inclinations to > smear the individual, to question the intelligence level, to restrain the > civil rights, to declare things to be not protected by law, all of which > I have said in the past that I abhor out of principle. No one has proposed restraint of civil rights. On the contrary, I'm glad you take your own opportunity to show us all how full of shit (yes, that's the word, my friend, "ladies present" or not) you really are. The smearing and the display of minimal intelligence are provided by you alone. > I detect also a lack of > concern about the menace of Communism. Everything I have to say, no matter > how correct it may be, is automatically "extreme symptoms of antisemitism." > Material such as this only serve to reinforce my beliefs. How correct it may be? Sorry for disturbing the group with loads of noise about this man. He's obviously a comedian. Anyone who could stand there and proclaim such views he puts forth as "correct" is either a great comedian or a total buffoon who doesn't quite understand how one determines correctness. > But this is just the kind of person that I am opposed to, those who > would crush the opposition, crush free expression, crush free choice. > This same person would slam the jail door on Ernst Zundel or provide the > match to burn a library. I welcome "crushing of the opposition" by showing that they were deliberately telling lies, by showing that they were doing so deliberately spreading hatred. As has been done to you. If you can't find any real defense against such "crushing" that shows your lies for what they are, why not just crawl back into the little hole from which you came, where your insecurities that led you to such bigotry may be put to better use. > HOW DOES ONE DISPROVE THAT HE IS A "NAZI," A "RACIST," A "BIGOT," OR ANY > OTHER EXPLITIVE THE LEFT LIKES TO USE? It's too late for you, you've already proven it in the affirmative. > In the last couple of weeks, the net has served to solidify some of > my beliefs and opinions. I believe even more that Christianity is the most > persecuted religion, and that it will get worse before it gets better. That's right, gather those persecuted Christians (as Gary Samuelson once claimed to be) together, to garner support. All the ones who kept silent will either leap up and join you or just continue to be silent. > This net is obviously not the place to expect a free, open discussion > of any religious topic unless a) it is 100% complementary of Judaism, or > b) it fits into "established" religions, or c) it is a Humanistic topic about > why Deism is wrong. I hope I cracked a few ivory towers. I hope it > has stirred some thoughts in the minds of true Christians about who you are > and where you should be going. And WHO doesn't want you to find out. And > why. What you should expect when a) you tell lies in order to be uncomplimentary, b) you can't support your mouthings with anything substantial, is exactly what you're getting. Don't cry. What you're complaining about is just what you deserve, given what you've had to say. One who tells lies and complains about the lies being exposed as such is indeed a baby. Yes, you say lots of uncomplimentary things. Are they the truth? Then expect a continuation of what's been directed at you. > I urge every Christian to read the Bible. Get several good translations, so > you can rectify any question about language. Find the oldest ones you can, > to avoid confusion in the newer translations, and then get some newer ones > for comparison. ... For the Catholics, remember that over 90% of > Catholic doctrine is in scripture--there's no sin in reading it. This really shows your stupidity, Black. No good Nazi would ever tell people to go back to the source and read. Reading leads to acquisition of knowledge. Besides, once they read the Bible, they'll know the truth about the made-up stories you've told. Whoops! (Does any Catholic feel offended by the insinuation of that last statement?) > Some of you asked for proof that the US Declaration of Independence is > based on scriptural law. For those of you who are open-minded, contact: > > The Christian Committee to Teach Bible law > PO Box 481 > Lakemore OH 44250 You mean, for those who would accept biased stories as fact. As you do whenever it suits you. -- "It's a lot like life..." Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr