Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!umcp-cs!mangoe
From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate)
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.religion.christian
Subject: Is this really net.rosen?
Message-ID: <4508@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Apr-85 18:32:18 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.4508
Posted: Tue Apr  2 18:32:18 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Apr-85 11:14:30 EST
Distribution: na
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 28

When the newslists came out recently, I noticed that Rich contributed 60% of
net.religion in the last time period.  This piqued my curiosity, so I took
some statistics:

    In net.religion:   82 articles
                       17 posted by rich
                        8 refer directly to rich
                       40 pertain to arguments involving rich not in other
                          two categories
                       17 have nothing to do with Rich

I should point out that the vast majority of the 40 articles pertain to Don
Black and the little inquisition which followed.  According to these numbers,
80% of this group (by articles) is devoted to Rich's discussion; this number
is higher when size of articles is taken into account.

   In net.r.c:  24 articles
                 5 posted by rich
                 7 responses to rich
                12 other discussions, of which
                   7 are the "translations" discussion

So Rich is using up half of the group.


Draw your own conclusions.

Charley Wingate    umcp-cs!mangoe