Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site teklds.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!teklds!larryg
From: larryg@teklds.UUCP (Larry Gardner)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: What is the meaning of Christ's resurrection after three days?
Message-ID: <514@teklds.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Apr-85 15:28:57 EST
Article-I.D.: teklds.514
Posted: Tue Apr  2 15:28:57 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Apr-85 05:46:31 EST
References: <858@hou2h.UUCP>
Reply-To: larryg@teklds.UUCP (Karen Clark)
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 25
Summary: 


Why must the Bible be made to fit in with science?  

If you believe in the Bible, which it appears you do, how can you
ignore the literalness of the disciples seeing, touching, and talking
with Jesus after He was raised (physically) from the dead.  Paul in
the epistles explains that if we believe in Jesus and He did not
(materially) rise from the dead, then we are to be most pitied.

The significance of Jesus' resurrection?  ALL OF CHRISTIANITY STANDS ON IT!!!!!

It means we serve a living God!! JESUS!!!  That sets Him apart from Mohammed
and any other "man".  It means we can know Jesus today because He LIVES!

So what if the Bible "appears" to conflict with science?  I don't really
know of anything that does conflict as of yet.  (here comes the responses,
I can see them now... :) ).

Make your choice, believe in ONENESS or whatever you want, but don't include
Jesus because He didn't, and doesn't teach that!

He said, I AM THE WAY, THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE, NO MAN COME TO THE FATHER
	 BUT THROUGH ME.

	 karen