Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site digi-g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!digi-g!brian
From: brian@digi-g.UUCP (Merlyn Leroy)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: ... talk to God ... (Really apologetics)
Message-ID: <530@digi-g.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 31-Mar-85 23:04:05 EST
Article-I.D.: digi-g.530
Posted: Sun Mar 31 23:04:05 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Apr-85 02:46:16 EST
References: <123@gymble.UUCP>
Reply-To: brian@digi-g.UUCP (brian)
Distribution: net
Organization: Digigraphic Systems Corp., Mpls, MN
Lines: 19
Summary: 

<The fact that netnews works is a miracle>

Found in article <123@gymble.UUCP> by bennet@gymble.UUCP (Tom Bennet):
>...Of course, if you assume at first that any miraculous story is false, I
>suppose it would be hard to convince you otherwise by arguments.

Gee, you mean we should assume that a miraculous story is TRUE until
proved otherwise!?  If it is hard to convince people of something (anything)
by arguments, on what basis do YOU believe in it?  Sheesh!  Just yesterday
I exploded, and one of my shoes landed on top of a passing freight train.
By the time the train reached its destination (St. Louis), I had totally
re-grown from a small toenail clipping in my left sock.  This feat registered
4.2 on the Miracle Scale.  Unfortunately, only a couple of people witnessed
this, but I KNOW you will assume this miraculous story is true, so why
worry about proof?

Merlyn Leroy
"...a dimension between stupidity and substance, between science and
superficiality, a place we call...The Usenet Zone"