Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!lydgate From: lydgate@reed.UUCP (Chris Lydgate) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: Re: another don Black type Message-ID: <1175@reed.UUCP> Date: Tue, 26-Mar-85 03:48:56 EST Article-I.D.: reed.1175 Posted: Tue Mar 26 03:48:56 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 28-Mar-85 23:51:59 EST References: <894@eisx.UUCP> Reply-To: lydgate@reed.UUCP (Chris Lydgate) Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon Lines: 46 Keywords: anti-semitism, cheese Summary: Samuel jumps the gun Sometimes people on the net get the wrong impression. Worse, sometimes they broadcast this misapprehension worldwide. Sadly, such is the case with Samuel and Monica. Samuel accuses Monica of anti-semitism, based solely on the following sentence: >> I think you should turn your >> efforts to salvation and perhaps to composing some catchy >> ditties about Moses or Abraham for prompt dumping in n.r.j. In article <894@eisx.UUCP> sms@eisx.UUCP (Samuel Saal) writes: >it is unabridged, unedited and fully inflammatory. Anti-semitism >does not begin when they are trying to kill you. I don't usually read this group, so I'm ignorant of any discussions you have had on this topic, but surely a definition of anti-semitism must include an *intention* on the part of the alleged anti-semite to advocate, foster, or practise discrimination on the basis of race. And surely, any accusation of anti-semitism must establish this intention to be valid. Further, since this kind of accusation can be very damaging in a personal, as well as professional, sense, it is my belief that no such accusation should be made without sufficient evidence of these intentions. As it happens, Monica is not anti-semitic in the slightest, as anyone who knows her will agree. Also, as it happens, she was in fact quoting someone else. In fact, the first sentence of her article ("I find your lack of faith disturbing.") is Darth Vader's line in Star Wars- and her keywords line was taken from the Bloom County "spelling bee" cartoon. Admittedly, Samuel wouldn't have known any of this, since he didn't ask Monica about her beliefs before he accused her of anti-semitism. Since his was a public accusation, I believe that he should have thought more carefully about the evidence on which he based his outrageous claim. If you read the sentence in question carefully, I think you will find that it only implies that the poster of the cheeses song would face similar flames if he had posted some silly "ditty" playing on some pun, in net.r.j. This statement, even taken alone + out of context, does not seem inflammatory to me. I hope that such accusations will be made more carefully in the future. -- chris lydgate c/o the information vortex !tektronix!reed!lydgate