Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site sdcc13.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc13!ee163ahe
From: ee163ahe@sdcc13.UUCP (VICTOR ROMANO)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Sex by numbers
Message-ID: <191@sdcc13.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Apr-85 15:42:46 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc13.191
Posted: Thu Apr  4 15:42:46 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Apr-85 02:17:12 EST
References: <206@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Reply-To: ee163ahe@sdcc13.UUCP (VICTOR ROMANO)
Distribution: net
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 48
Summary: 

In article <206@osu-eddie.UUCP> beslove@osu-eddie.UUCP (Adam Beslove) writes:
>Does anybody out there have a selection criteria they use for qualifying
>potential spouses?  After getting bashed around emotionally last year I set
>one up and it has worked wonders!  I know, it sounds awful, but it is very
>fair to all involved.  Better to disqualify someone early than to lead them
>(or yourself) on. Here's mine (modified here for application to either sex):
>
>1. Share my general philosophy and religion.
>2. Not a Bitch (Bitch Bitch.....)?
>3. Not Spoiled totally rotton by dad or mom & requiring spoiling by me
>   (aka Princess/Prince).
>4. Getting into a real career (one I can respect).
>5. Brains. 
>
>Simple, fair and straigh-forward.  Disqualification is done sequentially.
>Most selections don't make it past #4.  Have only met two who made it all
>the way to #5 in about 1 year.  One had a boyfriend, and one I am currently
>dating.  
>
>Well, what do you think?
>
>>>>>Adam Beslove		(aka Odious Verity)

	Personally, I tend to remove 4 & 5 from this list.  I then find
	a lot of females who follow the other three categories, along
	with one of my own (6. Is understanding of other people even
	when they go through experiences she has never gone through).
	The problem is that 99.99999% of those females are either:
	1. Not interested in me; 2. Not available (because they already
	have a boyfriend, or whatever); 3. Not available to anyone, period;
	4. Prove themselves interested in me and available, but eventually
	change their minds.  Very few females I know have not fallen into
	categories 1 through 3, and the remaining few fall into category
	4.  I'm looking forward to finding the .00001% who fall into
	none of these.

		Victor Romano

-------------------------------------------
There are unsmiling faces in fetters and chains
On a wheel in perpetual motion
Who belong to all races and answer all names
With no sign of an outward emotion
And they think it might make their lives easier
But the doorway before them is barred
And the game never ends when the whole world depends
On the turn of a friendly card
		-Alan Parsons