Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site h-sc1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!dcdwest!ittvax!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!h-sc1!harmon_c From: harmon_c@h-sc1.UUCP (david harmon) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: A Small Victory; Not at All Message-ID: <237@h-sc1.UUCP> Date: Sat, 30-Mar-85 15:02:35 EST Article-I.D.: h-sc1.237 Posted: Sat Mar 30 15:02:35 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 2-Apr-85 07:55:44 EST References: <824@druxo.UUCP> <269@mhuxr.UUCP> <2349@randvax.UUCP> <277@mhuxr.UUCP> Organization: Harvard Univ. Science Center Lines: 28 > > Ed Hall: > > How, pray tell, does using the generic ``they'' make things ``more difficult > > to understand''? As a matter of fact, I find *less* ambiguity in its use, > > since it clearly indicates that sex is unimportant, whereas the use of ``he'' > > always implies the possibility of restriction to males. The use of ``they'' > > introduces a singular/plural ambiguity that is much less of a problem, since > > context usually makes it quite unambiguous. > > > > Ambiguity in language is *essential*--it allows us to point to those > > elements of a statement which are important, and discard those which > > are not. As a tool of our thoughts, it influences how we form concepts, > > and as the chief instrument of our social learning, it influences the > > very structure of our society. > Say what!!!! Ambiguous language does precisely the opposite. It prevents > those with whom one communicates from understanding the important points of > the communication, surely the opposite of the communicator's intentions. > Unless one communicates with the intent of deceiving or otherwise not > being understood, one should strive for as little ambiguity as possible > (unless of course, one is a diplomat :-) > I think the original poster meant "generality", not ambiguity. The use of "they" promotes generality. It also promotes ambiguity slightly, but I think the trade is worth it. > Marcel Simon Dave Harmon harvard!h-sc1!harmon.arpa (I think)