Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!clarke
From: clarke@utcs.UUCP (Clarke, Jim)
Newsgroups: can.general
Subject: Re: General research for/by the military.
Message-ID: <580@utcs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 11-Apr-85 14:00:00 EST
Article-I.D.: utcs.580
Posted: Thu Apr 11 14:00:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Apr-85 14:23:51 EST
References: <5437@utzoo.UUCP> <487@deepthot.UUCP> <2255@wateng.UUCP> <578@utcs.UUCP> <5452@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: clarke@utcs.UUCP (Jim Clarke)
Organization: University of Toronto - General Purpose UNIX
Lines: 10
Summary: 

In article <5452@utzoo.UUCP> henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) writes:
>It does not render his arguments invalid, but it offers some reason for
>hesitating to accept them without detailed proof.
	Does that mean (since I *would* accept military money in easily-
	imagined circumstances) that you will accept my arguments more
	readily than Julian <sorry, I forget the last name>'s?

	(Actually, of course, the previous parenthesis is there in exactly
	that hope.  We're talking about a natural human tendency, but not
	a respectable one.)