Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Dr. Emmanuel Wu)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: $$$ - logical, eh?
Message-ID: <804@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 29-Mar-85 12:47:20 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.804
Posted: Fri Mar 29 12:47:20 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 30-Mar-85 02:17:37 EST
References: <238@dscvax2.UUCP> <783@pyuxd.UUCP> <8362@watarts.UUCP>
Organization: STRONGARM COLLECTION AGENCY:  We have no slogan
Lines: 30

>>The "fact"?  How about "the opinion"?  Given the large numbers of people
>>unrelated to the "industry" of abortion (do you know of ANYTHING that
>>people engage in and render money for that does NOT become a money-grubbing
>>>profit-motive "industry"?--end of argument about "abortion industry") that
>>actively support the right to abortion, I fail to see where your "fact"
>>comes from.
>>      				Rich Rosen     ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr

> 1. I agree with Rich, as stated above; not every one makes money from pro-abortion stances.

What are you trying to do, ruin both of our reputations?  :-)

> 2. I have not seen how rich an abortionist can be, at least today.
> 
> 3. Just because anything becomes a profit-motive industry does not make that
>    profit motive any more right---  continuation of arguement
>    about "abortion industry".

Nope, still the end.  It merely marks as an irrelevancy the notion that "but
these people are making huge profits from doing this, thus it's wrong".

> 4. Abortionists have historically made quite a lot of money at what they do.
>    (This fact has more to do with stimulating thought then proving anything--
>    it may not apply to today).

Those who do things illegal often charge high prices for their services.
Another irrelevancy...
-- 
Meet the new wave, same as the old wave...
      				Rich Rosen     ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr