Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site stl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!mcvax!ukc!stc-a!stl!dww
From: dww@stl.UUCP (David Wright)
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: IBM claim that 370 has "64 bit architecture"
Message-ID: <137@stl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Mar-85 08:14:06 EST
Article-I.D.: stl.137
Posted: Tue Mar 26 08:14:06 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 31-Mar-85 04:19:03 EST
References: <408@teddy.UUCP>
Organization: STL,Harlow,UK.
Lines: 4

I always thought that the IBM 370 was a 12 bit architecture at heart? 
That was what I was told when I asked why programs could not 
address segments of more than 4K bytes, (i.e. the adress field in the 
instructions is never more than 12 bits long).