Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 ggr 02/21/84; site bocar.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!bocar!man From: man@bocar.UUCP (M Nevar) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Cassette Tape Durability Message-ID: <110@bocar.UUCP> Date: Mon, 8-Apr-85 12:31:20 EST Article-I.D.: bocar.110 Posted: Mon Apr 8 12:31:20 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 9-Apr-85 02:32:40 EST References: <4540@umcp-cs.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Piscataway Lines: 40 This is in response to the tape durability questions raised recently. I presently own approximately 250 cassettes recorded on both a Technics 3-head deck and a Tanberg 3-head deck. 200 of these are Maxell UDXLII's. The other fifty or so are TDK SA, Dennon, and some imported Technics tapes. Let me first say that the Technics are the best I have used, but they are hard to get and rumor has it that they are not the same anymore. These are about 8 years old. The others range from a few weeks to 8 years. I have only had one problem with my Maxell's, that being a broken tape. The TDK's however have gone down considerably in the last 4 or 5 years. The 8 year old TDK's have been fine, and I still can enjoy them without any noticable loss of quality, but the newer ones have been a problem. I am currently re-recording these onto Maxell's. Dropouts are a problem with these as are totally un-recordable portions of tape. I used to have about 50 or 60 of them, but I have been replacing them gradually (as they became a problem). My car stereo also has had a few of these for lunch, I usually buy a box at a time, and I was always getting at least one TDK in the bunch that wasn't good for some reason. After awhile of this I got disgusted and switched allegiance to Maxell, with very satisfying results. As I recall, just after these tapes started getting bad, TDK introduced an upgrade to the SA line called SA-X. Now, these may just be the old-style SA's, but I don't know for sure. Maxell upgraded the XLII to the XLII-S, but I haven't noticed any difference. Anyone notice anything like this ? I have nothing to report on the Denon's yet, as I have just started to test them. One note on recording records on the 'virgin' play. This is not always good. On the first play, your stylus will pick up all the junk that the cutting stylus has left behind. When I get a new record, I treat it with a record cleaner (LAST record cleaner), then play it through once. Then I clean it again to get all the vinyl that the stylus has dragged out. Then I clean the stylus with STYLAST and use LAST record preservative on the record. Now I record the album. I have gotten fantastic results using this method. I first read about it in The Absolute Sound and it was recently recommended in Stereophile. Happy Recording, Mark Nevar