Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!lydgate From: lydgate@reed.UUCP (Chris Lydgate) Newsgroups: net.college Subject: Who's minding the store? Message-ID: <1157@reed.UUCP> Date: Sat, 23-Mar-85 19:23:00 EST Article-I.D.: reed.1157 Posted: Sat Mar 23 19:23:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 27-Mar-85 02:53:26 EST Reply-To: lydgate@reed.UUCP (Chris Lydgate) Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon Lines: 26 Keywords: Apathy, paranoia, bureaucracy Here at Reed there has been a lot of argument recently about how decisions involving the college community should be made. Although the community Constitution gives enormous powers to an elected Senate, made up of students and faculty, some people feel that these decisions are being made instead by the administration. Examples such as the locking of dorms at 7 pm, the removal of free phones in dorms, and interference in disciplinary cases, are often cited by people who feel that the administration is making decisions in areas traditionally reserved for students and faculty. Have any other collges or universities on the net had similar controversies? What degree of influence/control do students or faculty have over the running of other institutions? Mail, postings, flames, all appreciated. -- chris lydgate c/o the information vortex !tektronix!reed!lydgate