Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84 chuqui version 1.7 9/23/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!nsc!chuqui
From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Ken Arndt vs. many (my opinion)
Message-ID: <2538@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 29-Mar-85 15:23:24 EST
Article-I.D.: nsc.2538
Posted: Fri Mar 29 15:23:24 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 31-Mar-85 03:06:15 EST
References: <294@ttidcc.UUCP> <2531@nsc.UUCP> <1346@amdahl.UUCP>
Reply-To: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach)
Organization: The Village
Lines: 29
Summary: 

In article <1346@amdahl.UUCP> utv@amdahl.UUCP (Frank Dibbell) writes:
>> Mr Von Rospach finishes with:
>
>> True-- people who aren't intelligent enough to be offended by Arndt
>> aren't intelligent enough to recognize the arguments of others...
>
>  Are you saying that those of us who aren't offended by Ken's postings
>  lack intelligence?  Or are you just one of those limp-wristed, knee-
>  jerk, egg-sucking, bleeding-heart, quiche-eating yuppie-neo-liberals
>  who wring their hands everytime someone expresses a divergent opinion,
>  or pokes fun at you?

Actually, neither. Arndt's postings are too carefully put together to be
the ramdom flamings people seem to react to them as. It is my opinion that
Ken is either one person or a group of people who are carefully taking
positions designed specifically to piss the most number of people possible
at any one time. He/they probably think its funny to watch everyone run
around and try to prove how assinine the positions are. He/they know that--
they don't believe it, they just enjoy watching others try to refute it. I,
on the other hand wonder about the people who are silly enough to try to
support it.... 

chuq

-- 
Chuq Von Rospach, National Semiconductor
{cbosgd,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!chuqui   nsc!chuqui@decwrl.ARPA

Be seeing you!