Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watrose.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watrose!gwhawkins
From: gwhawkins@watrose.UUCP (gwhawkins)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.religion,net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Re: Another small question.
Message-ID: <7428@watrose.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 7-Apr-85 19:41:44 EST
Article-I.D.: watrose.7428
Posted: Sun Apr  7 19:41:44 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 8-Apr-85 02:02:26 EST
References: <1521@decwrl.UUCP> <5426@utzoo.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 15
Xref: watmath net.flame:9143 net.religion:6559 net.philosophy:1610

> I do not think that killing that monkey can ever be justified. I think
> that it is only moral to kill animals when their death is necessary for
> our survival (surprise! the same criteria I use for killing human beings).
> Laura Creighton

This is all well and good, but what about the grey areas such as:

	"We must eliminate _______ for our survival as a people."
	fill in the balank with your favourite of the following
	honkies, nazis, jews, commies, THEM, politicians, etc.

Basically my question to you is: What constitutes survival?

		larry fast (Universty of Waterloo)
		broadcasting from exile