Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!fortune!brower
From: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard Brower)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.religion,net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Another small question.
Message-ID: <5184@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Apr-85 14:26:16 EST
Article-I.D.: fortune.5184
Posted: Tue Apr  9 14:26:16 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 10-Apr-85 05:59:56 EST
References: <1521@decwrl.UUCP> <5426@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard brower)
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 13
Xref: watmath net.flame:9173 net.religion:6593 net.philosophy:1619
Summary: 

In article <5426@utzoo.UUCP> laura@utzoo.UUCP (Laura Creighton) writes:
>I do not think that killing that monkey can ever be justified. I think
>that it is only moral to kill animals when their death is necessary for
>our survival (surprise! the same criteria I use for killing human beings).
>
>Laura Creighton
>utzoo!laura

So, they ate the brains.  Food is necessary for survival.  The monkey's death
is justified and moral.  Why do you contradict yourself in the above paragraph?
-- 
Richard A. Brower		Fortune Systems
{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd,hpda,sri-unix,harpo}!fortune!brower