Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site v1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!v1!josh
From: josh@v1.UUCP (Josh Knight)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: re Waterloo C compiler
Message-ID: <147@v1.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Apr-85 23:16:39 EST
Article-I.D.: v1.147
Posted: Wed Apr  3 23:16:39 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Apr-85 02:04:58 EST
References: <12309@watmath.UUCP>
Organization: IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, N.Y.
Lines: 17

>    Also, CMS is essentially batch-oriented, I can easily see batch programs
>    holding onto output until it knows its done.

Disagree.  MVS is clearly batch oriented.  CMS is clearly not batch
oriented.  Indeed one of the shortcomings of VM/CMS is that there
isn't any easy way to run "batch" (as in background) commands...
or do multitasking in general.****

The opinions expressed (or implied) are my own, not those of my employer.


		Josh Knight, IBM T.J. Watson Research
    josh at YKTVMH on BITNET, josh.yktvmx.ibm on CSnet,
    ...!philabs!v1!josh

**** posting was about Waterloo CMS C compiler...this is not an
unsolicited comment about VM/CMS in the wrong forum.