Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!tsc2597 From: tsc2597@acf4.UUCP (Sam Chin) Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Re: The GNU Manifesto - let the people decide Message-ID: <1040010@acf4.UUCP> Date: Sun, 31-Mar-85 21:10:00 EST Article-I.D.: acf4.1040010 Posted: Sun Mar 31 21:10:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 3-Apr-85 02:05:56 EST References: <258@looking.UUCP> Organization: New York University Lines: 26 <> "What I don't like is inferior products that displace superior products becuase they were written by fanatical communists like RMS." Hey come on, this statement almost degrades to the level of DOCTOR VAX who has been writing libelious mail to net.apple. I have been using GNU emacs for a few days now and it is great. RMS and company are certainly good programmers and I certainly have faith in them producing a decent GNU. GNU emacs is at least as powerful as commercial versions of emacs which sell for thousands of dollars. We are not looking at dinky $50 dollar utilities (I know, I wrote some during weekends when I was bored and sell them too) but at a major programming effort whose distribution source is about 3 megabytes. Besides, with all the big guys around, and the incredible number of existing software companies, most of the small guys are doomed anyway unless they have something *really really* innovative - just ask wall street or any venture capitalist. Perhaps we shall see a reemergence of free software after the big software shakeout. Personally, if I wrote another package which was between "useful" and "good", I would probably give it away free or freeware. If I wrote something "truly wonderful", then I would weigh trying to sell it commercially but even then with todays competition, I would have about a 10% chance of survival. Sam Chin allegra!cmcl2!acf4!tsc2597 tsc2597.acf4@nyu