Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.PCS 1/10/84; site ahutb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!bellcore!allegra!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!drutx!ahuta!ahutb!seb
From: seb@ahutb.UUCP (s.e.badian)
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: perpetual motion(the suppression of liquid hydrogen, a clean fuel)
Message-ID: <611@ahutb.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 1-Apr-85 11:07:19 EST
Article-I.D.: ahutb.611
Posted: Mon Apr  1 11:07:19 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Apr-85 14:58:16 EST
References: <608@vortex.UUCP> <491@spp2.UUCP> <706@mhuxt.UUCP> <2085@sun.uucp>, <4398@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 18

REFERENCES:  <608@vortex.UUCP> <491@spp2.UUCP> <706@mhuxt.UUCP> <2085@sun.uucp>, <4398@umcp-cs.UUCP>


>There are plenty of ways to transfer energy from one point to another;
>it's just that gasoline is still one of the most cost-effective (short
>term anyway).

It's cost effective in the short term if ignore all the other costs which
are quickly becoming short term, like acid rain. Our reckless use of
fossil fuels has killed 99% of the lakes in the Adirondacks, and it's
doing the same to lakes in the high Sierra and New England. I wonder
how long it will take the country to realize that it really is cost
effective to stop using so much fossil fuel. Ever wonder how much
revenue the state of Vermont gets from trees, trees that are being killed
by acid rain? Think about it.

Sharon Badian  ihnp4!hocsp!ahutb!seb