Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Dr. Emmanuel Wu)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: Lou Reed's past employment
Message-ID: <774@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Mar-85 17:03:12 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.774
Posted: Tue Mar 26 17:03:12 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 27-Mar-85 05:19:03 EST
References: <8774@brl-tgr.ARPA> <633@pyuxd.UUCP> <721@ccice5.UUCP> <712@pyuxd.UUCP> <741@ccice5.UUCP>
Organization: STRONGARM COLLECTION AGENCY:  We have no slogan
Lines: 25

> If you are going to be this sensitive about comments concerning your postings,
> I suggest you reconsider posting at all.  I've been nailed a lot worse than
> this on other news groups.  The reply was directed at everyone that had made
> rude comments to the questioner.  Your posting was readily available at the
> time I felt I should comment.  Are you suggesting I should have inserted the
> same reply in every article that had a subject line that read "Lou Reed's 
> past employment"?  My employer expects me to work once in a while!
>   [ROBERT ZARCONE]

And these were the comments which he made:

> Well that reply should sure get people to ask more questions on this net!
> I love the "EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT, STUPID!" answers readilly available to
> our fellow netters.  (I plead no contest).  Seriously people, let's ALL
> try to remember that the age spread here is probably 20-30+ years.  Let's
> just blast people when they REALLY deserve it, like those jerks who don't
> like Prince! (guess what goes here).  [ZARCONE]

Given the heated tone of this man's remarks, I feel quite justified in
rebutting them by pointing out that he had grossly misinterpreted and
misrepresented me.  And, by the way, if YOU are going to be this sensitive
about comments concerning YOUR postings, ... (guess what goes here)
-- 
"Does the body rule the mind or does the mind rule the body?  I dunno."
				Rich Rosen 	ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr