Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site qantel.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!zehntel!vlsvax1!qantel!larry From: larry@qantel.UUCP (Larry Barnes@ex2559) Newsgroups: net.nlang Subject: Re: Re: Being taken care of. (prepositions) Message-ID: <401@qantel.UUCP> Date: Sun, 31-Mar-85 16:19:48 EST Article-I.D.: qantel.401 Posted: Sun Mar 31 16:19:48 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 5-Apr-85 03:39:11 EST Reply-To: larry@qantel.UUCP (Larry Barnes@ex2559) Distribution: net Organization: MDS Qantel, Hayward, CA Lines: 37 > In article <186@ihlpm.UUCP> cher@ihlpm.UUCP (Mike Cherepov) writes: > > >This is a general question about ending sentences with > >prepositions. > >It formally appears to be an illegitimate deed, but ... > > > >Do somebody knows? > > Mike Cherepov > > Actually they are not *really* prepositions, they are more > like adverbs, and they are a remnant of an *ancient* Germanic > construct, also found in German(where they are called seperable > prefixes). Basically the pair of a verb and a "preposition" > act like a new (effectively) compound verb, except the "prefix" > goes at the end of the clause. Thus "fill up" is a different verb > than "fill", and "put down" is a different verb than "put". > -- > > Sarima (Stanley Friesen) The discussion about particles in English is a tad amusing for the lack of scholastic references. The two books I have handy are: Winograd, Terry. Language as a Cognitive Process (vol 1 of 2, projected). Addison-Wesley, 1983. and: Bresnan, Joan. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. The MIT Press, 1982. Both go into the relatively recent phenomenon (historically) of turning verbs that take prepositional phrases as complements into verb-plus-particle combinations. This is akin to the separable compounds in German, but appear to be an independent evolution in English. (Sarima's comments about prescriptive grammar are right on.) Larry