Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site digi-g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!digi-g!brian
From: brian@digi-g.UUCP (Merlyn Leroy)
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: On "orphaned" words.
Message-ID: <550@digi-g.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Apr-85 13:22:16 EST
Article-I.D.: digi-g.550
Posted: Tue Apr  9 13:22:16 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Apr-85 01:07:27 EST
References: <7169@watdaisy.UUCP> <27400001@siemens.UUCP>
Reply-To: brian@digi-g.UUCP (brian)
Organization: Digigraphic Systems Corp., Mpls, MN
Lines: 12
Summary: 

<to and fro>

	Along the same lines, how about words that are always negated?
such as:

	incognito	vs	cognito
	invincible	vs	vincible
	impregnable	vs	pregnable
	impervious	vs	pervious

Merlyn Leroy
"That's Credible!"