Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!mcnc!duke!br
From: br@duke.UUCP (Balu Raman)
Newsgroups: net.nlang.india
Subject: Re: Why flame?
Message-ID: <5700@duke.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 6-Apr-85 00:45:47 EST
Article-I.D.: duke.5700
Posted: Sat Apr  6 00:45:47 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 7-Apr-85 04:30:16 EST
References: <3913@ucla-cs.ARPA> <603@rlgvax.UUCP> <4985@mit-vax.UUCP> <5689@duke.UUCP> <1495@ut-sally.UUCP>
Reply-To: br@duke.UUCP (Balu Raman)
Organization: Duke University
Lines: 14
Summary: 

In article <1495@ut-sally.UUCP> riddle@ut-sally.UUCP (Prentiss Riddle) writes:
>Net.nlang.india certainly has been full of flames lately.  Why?  Is there
>any reason why we can't discuss things with a bit more restraint?  This
>isn't net.abortion, after all.
>
>Please, if you must flame, why not post it to net.flame and reserve
>net.nlang.india for reasoned discourse?  I realize that this suggestion is
>hardly in the Usenet tradition :-) , but I think it will make a more
>enjoyable newsgroup for all of us.
>
I wholly agree with you here. I am not going to say I didn't start it.

                                              Balu Raman.
                                              br!duke