Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site unmvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!unmvax!cliff
From: cliff@unmvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: Reparations, Indians, Property
Message-ID: <763@unmvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 1-Apr-85 04:52:48 EST
Article-I.D.: unmvax.763
Posted: Mon Apr  1 04:52:48 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 3-Apr-85 02:03:42 EST
References: <863@wucs.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Lines: 24

> Well, I stand to some extent corrected.  However, I challenge you to come
> up with a discussion of this issue by the libertarians on the net 
> (besides yourself, but you were *responding* to *my* *initiation* of the
> issue, which is a very different story!).  In my several years on the net
> I've seen no such thing.  And such explanation has often been called for,
> because (I'll bet) most non-libertarian netters would be surprised to
> learn that libertarians support many "left"-sounding causes (like restoring
> land to Amer. Indians, to blacks, etc.).

Gosh golly... I'm getting out of this Libertarian mess once and for all.  Next
thing you know they will be asking for the repeal of victimless crime laws
(those commie-pinkos!) ...

Of course you have a good point.  No matter how many libertarians try to
stress libertarian beliefs that map to the left side of the political
spectrum, there are always the on going discussions of taxation to make
people think we are ultra-conservatives.  When we admit that we believe
government handouts are not the solution to poverty we are further pigeon-
holed.

	--Cliff [Matthews]
	{purdue, cmcl2, ihnp4}!lanl!unmvax!cliff
	{csu-cs, pur-ee, convex, gatech, ucbvax}!unmvax!cliff
	4744 Trumbull S.E. - Albuquerque  NM  87108 - (505) 265-9143