Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site talcott.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!gjk From: gjk@talcott.UUCP (Greg Kuperberg) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Turkey in the Straw Message-ID: <382@talcott.UUCP> Date: Tue, 2-Apr-85 23:15:15 EST Article-I.D.: talcott.382 Posted: Tue Apr 2 23:15:15 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 4-Apr-85 06:36:37 EST References: <568@whuxl.UUCP> Organization: Harvard Lines: 29 ... > My attempts to challenge the *assumptions* of Libertarianism are entirely > legitimate and cannot be refuted by simply labelling such challenges > as "strawman" arguments. > tim sevener whuxl!orb Now that we've had a flame from an "anti-Libertarian" about having his articles labelled strawman arguments, I must ask the $64,000 question: Exactly what do you think that the Libertarians believe, Tim? The last time someone asked this question, he got a bunch of responses to the tune of "Libertarianism is the root of all evil, while Socialism is the human race's salvation and destiny." But I don't want anything like that. No, Tim, imagine a gentle, warm-hearted, and intelligent Libertarian. They do exist, you know. Anyway, what do you think such a person would believe? What would be the backbone of his/her philosophy? And why am I posting this to the net instead of mailing it? Because this is not just a question to Tim, this is an opinion poll. If you feel your definition of Libertarianism shows a unique perspective, then please post your answer to the question in the previous paragraph. If you don't, then please mail your opinion to me. I will summarize the results after a week or so. Also, please specify whether or not you are pro-, anti-, or neutral to Libertarianism. -- Greg Kuperberg harvard!talcott!gjk "No Marxist can deny that the interests of socialism are higher than the interests of the right of nations to self-determination." -Lenin, 1918