Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: Libertarianism & property
Message-ID: <1552@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 3-Apr-85 13:16:26 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1552
Posted: Wed Apr  3 13:16:26 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 5-Apr-85 04:28:16 EST
References: <1440@dciem.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: U.Texas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 23

[]

From: mmt@dciem.UUCP (Martin Taylor)
>>>     The point I was trying to make in my previous article was that
>>>when formerly unclaimed land is homesteaded, the rest of society loses
>>>the right of access and use of the land that they formerly enjoyed.
>> 
>>If you want to secure right of access to unowned land, go claim it.
>But I don't want it; I just want to be able to use it, along with
>everyone else who likes that kind of place.  I don't want to deny
>them the right to use it, and I don't want anyone denying me the
>right to use it.  I have SOME rights, after all, even in Libertaria.

So form a co-op, or allow people to use the land whenever they want,
or whatever...  What's the big deal?

--
The above viewpoints are mine.  They are unrelated to
those of anyone else, including my cats and my employer.

Ken Montgomery  "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"
...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm  [Usenet, when working]
kjm@ut-ngp.ARPA  [for Arpanauts only]