Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mordor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!zehntel!vlsvax1!qantel!dual!mordor!space@mit-mc
From: space@mit-mc
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: L5 and SPACEPAC
Message-ID: <1336@mordor.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 29-Mar-85 00:11:17 EST
Article-I.D.: mordor.1336
Posted: Fri Mar 29 00:11:17 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Apr-85 05:40:35 EST
Sender: daemon@mordor.UUCP
Lines: 8

From: Robert E. Bruccoleri <BRUC@MIT-MC>

From what I've read in the L5 News, L5 has not decided on an official
policy towards SDI, so presumably, neither has SPACEPAC. It would
be interesting to read their response to a letter just like the
one you posted in the Space Digest.

Bob Bruccoleri