Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site phri.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!timeinc!phri!roy
From: roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith)
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: Re: use of net.sources (rebuttal of large postings flame)
Message-ID: <195@phri.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Mar-85 11:26:41 EST
Article-I.D.: phri.195
Posted: Wed Mar 27 11:26:41 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Mar-85 06:30:27 EST
References: <9449@brl-tgr.ARPA> <130@persci.UUCP>
Organization: Public Health Research Inst. (NY, NY)
Lines: 26

> > I strongly suggest that we AVOID the use of net.sources (or new
> > subgroups) for new, large software distributions. [...] net.sources
> > is an EXTREMELY UN-economical way to distribute software.
> 
> I quite disagree. It's all fine and dandy for those with ARPA access to
> smugly dictate that item x may be had by [...] transferring with 'ftp'.
> [...]  I am sure Lauren would not be so quick to condemn these postings
> if he didn't have ARPA access.

	Oh, come on.  I don't have ARPA access either; this has not been
a serious detriment to my acquiring software.  Sometimes I ask people to
email the source to me, sometimes I send a tape, or occasionally people
publish public uucp info so I can do the uucp version of anonymous ftp
and get it myself (the best way, in my mind).

	In my opinion, a short description of the software (a la the
toolchest) and instructions for getting the distribution is preferable
to posting the whole source.
-- 

cmcl2!rocky2!cubsvax -\
       vax135!timeinc -> !phri!roy (Roy Smith, System Administrator)
             allegra -/

The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect
the views of the Public Health Research Institute.