Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!unc!goodrum
From: goodrum@unc.UUCP (Cloyd Goodrum)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: "Correlation? Absolutely." ... say what?!
Message-ID: <56@unc.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 20-Apr-85 16:38:18 EST
Article-I.D.: unc.56
Posted: Sat Apr 20 16:38:18 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 22-Apr-85 00:15:33 EST
References: <cmu-cs-e.242>
Reply-To: goodrum@unc.UUCP (Cloyd Goodrum)
Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lines: 18
Summary: 

In article <cmu-cs-e.242> hua@cmu-cs-edu1.ARPA (Ernest Hua) writes:

>... The law simply says that you may choose to have an abortion in
>the first trimester.  It does not say that you MUST have an abortion.
>The courts are certainly pro-choice.

 and

>
>Hardly.  They are pro-choice-in-the-first-trimester.  
>
	If I remember the contents of the Roe Vs.Wade opinion correctly,
I believe that the Supreme Court is also pro-choice-in-the-second-trimester.
I believe that the only distinction made between the first and second
trimesters is that states may regulate the conditions under which abortions
are performed only in the second trimester.

Cloyd Goodrum