Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site tut.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!nbires!boulder!tut!bonnie
From: bonnie@tut.UUCP (Bonnie Norman)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Correlation? Absolutely.
Message-ID: <131@tut.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 20-Apr-85 19:10:42 EST
Article-I.D.: tut.131
Posted: Sat Apr 20 19:10:42 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Apr-85 00:54:28 EST
References: <248@dscvax2.UUCP> <>
Reply-To: bonnie@tut.UUCP (Bonnie Norman)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 26

In article <> bmt@we53.UUCP writes:
>Recent court decisions have upheld ANYONE's right to a dead baby.  If the mother
>wants an abortion and the father doesn't, the mother's right is upheld.  If the
>father wants his child aborted and the mother doesn't, the father's rights are
>upheld.  If the mother is a minor and wants an abortion and her parents don't,
>the minor's rights are upheld.  If the mother is a minor and the parents want
>the baby aborted and she doesn't, the parents' rights are upheld.

This sure is news to me.  Could you send me more information on this?  My
ex would be REAL interested to know that there were legal means of forcing
me to have an abortion.  Could he have had me locked up for refusing to
do what he wanted me to?  Or maybe he just could have hit me with a heavy
fine. Hmmm.  I guess I'm having a hard time believing this bit of pro-life
babble. 

>So please, stop the lying about being "pro-choice".  You're NOT.

I think you need to be more specific about who you're addressing this to.
You may think that people who call themselves *pro-choice* are really just
*pro-deadbaby*, but I've got a 3-year old doing somersaults across my feet
right now who would just love to prove you wrong.  I claim to be pro-choice
and I AM.  I WANTED to have this child - but I've never condemned anyone
else for making a different decision.
 
So please, stop the generalizations about people who don't agree with you.