Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ut-sally.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!ut-sally!crandell
From: crandell@ut-sally.UUCP (Jim Crandell)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Re: Cassettes / Audio Amatuer
Message-ID: <1645@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Apr-85 12:17:33 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.1645
Posted: Thu Apr 18 12:17:33 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Apr-85 07:30:11 EST
References: <1477@decwrl.UUCP> <451@cybvax0.UUCP> <462@edison.UUCP> <1620@ut-sally.UUCP> <10008@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 17

> 
> > My experience with both TDK and Memorex is virtually identical.
> 
> I don't know about the welded vrs. screw argument, but I've found
> the quality control on Memorex Audio and Video cassettes to be somewhat
> lacking,
> 
> -Ron

Right.  Please try rereading the quoted posting and putting the line in
context.

Thanks.
-- 

    Jim Crandell, C. S. Dept., The University of Texas at Austin
               {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!crandell