Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbneb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!bellcore!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!cbosgd!cbsck!cbneb!adm
From: adm@cbneb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Manditory Seatbelt Laws
Message-ID: <3093@cbneb.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 10-Apr-85 14:24:27 EST
Article-I.D.: cbneb.3093
Posted: Wed Apr 10 14:24:27 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 15-Apr-85 00:32:38 EST
Sender: adm@cbneb.UUCP
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, OHIO
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:nmtvax:-39300:cbnap:9500010:000:982
Nf-From: cbnap!tel    Apr 10 12:42:00 1985

>>From the keys of Steve Henning, AT&T Bell Labs, Reading, PA rduxb!2141smh
>>
>>I don't care if you wear a seatbelt or not if you don't use my insurance
>>company or try to file a claim for personal injury against me.  I have a
>>right to be protected from personal injury costs of morons that don't use
>>seat belts.
>>/* ---------- */
	I won't file a claim if you don't hit me. 

	The logical extension of this moronic logic is to outlaw
all activities that have any negative (increase) effect on insurance
rates.  This would obviously include use of tobacco and liqour and
should certainly extend to skiing, any use of personal transportation
of any kind, mountain climbing or any thing else that makes life worth
living.  Personnally I would be quite happy to pay the increased insurance
rates brought on by the premature deaths of all persons supporting this 
legislation.
	The only possible exception would be for the driver.
Keep them where they belong!

			ihnp4!cbnap!tel