Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekcrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!terryl
From: terryl@tekcrl.UUCP ()
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: More on Seatbelts
Message-ID: <106@tekcrl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 23-Apr-85 13:51:37 EST
Article-I.D.: tekcrl.106
Posted: Tue Apr 23 13:51:37 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Apr-85 07:48:54 EST
References: <1347@reed.UUCP>, <465@edison.UUCP>
Lines: 10

>How about taking that fine for not having infant seats in the car
>and giving the offender a seat...or better yet, make it a fix it
>ticket where the offender has to show an infant seat installed in
>the car along with a receipt for the seat (wouldn't want them to
>borrow a neighbors seat for the day, now would we?).  Second 
>citation would mandate a much stiffer penalty and no fix it clause.


    Actually, that's the way it works here in Oregon, me thinks. The fine
for not having a kid in one of those infant seats is used to buy one.