Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2d.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!godot!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!bellcore!sabre!zeta!epsilon!gamma!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hou2d!afb3 From: afb3@hou2d.UUCP Newsgroups: net.invest,net.consumers Subject: Re: Universal Life Message-ID: <530@hou2d.UUCP> Date: Mon, 8-Apr-85 10:56:02 EST Article-I.D.: hou2d.530 Posted: Mon Apr 8 10:56:02 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 12-Apr-85 04:05:30 EST References: <367@ihu1m.UUCP>, <584@houxu.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 49 Xref: linus net.invest:559 net.consumers:1577 I have an interesting mix of all the mentioned insurance types including the following: 1) Whole life (20% of insurance plan) 2) Universal Life (about an equal amount to whole, 20%) 3) Term (40% on plan) 4) Accidental (not part of basic plan. I figure that if I get bumped off traveling for my company or in the insanity of the New Jersey/New York highway system, my family deserves a wind fall. 5) "Savings" (20% of program. Real savings should be part of any good "insurance" program!!!) As I suspect with most people, I bought Whole Life when I was young and foolish. Thats not to say that I consider it that terrible a move, but it is expensive. My "Universal life" was purchased for an interesting set of reasons (about two years ago), which include: 1) For roughly 50% more preimium I get 2 1/2 times the insurance I got with the same company as whole life. 2) In 6 years the premiums vanish (and unless the interest rates reaaly tumble, they stay vanished). 3) My existing policies with that company have sufficient cash value to allow me to "borrow" the premiums to keep the policy in force while I'm paying the Universal life premiums (only diminishing the death benifit by the small amount of the cash value loan outstanding). After the 6th year I can resume my whole life payments with all my policies in place. 4) Like "whole life", this insurance remains in force until I choose to stop it (no renewal BS). All in all, I thought the "Universal" option pretty reasonable. At the time I purchased it, it seems to have nearly the cost advantage of the term option (given a reasonable and probable rate of return) but retained some of the important "features" of Whole Life (IE. permanance). I would be VERY interested in how the Government views Universal life. As it appears, others seem to have knowledge of this. Comments?? Al Baldwin AT&T-Bell Labs ...!ihnp4!hou2d!afb3 [These opinions are my own....Who else would want them!!!]